atom09:Site Analysis
(→04 Scenarios) |
|||
(27 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Image:01_Interview.jpg|'''Neighbor''' | Image:01_Interview.jpg|'''Neighbor''' | ||
Image:interview_Science_Centre2.jpg|'''Science Centre''' | Image:interview_Science_Centre2.jpg|'''Science Centre''' | ||
+ | Image:Combined.jpg|'''Analysis interview Science Centre''' | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
− | '''2.2 Green & Water System''' | + | '''2.2 Pedestrian System''' |
+ | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | ||
+ | Image:Pedestrian_Entrances.jpg|'''Pedestrian Entrance''' | ||
+ | Image:Pedestrian_Flows.jpg|'''Pedestrian Flow''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Image:Opening_hours.jpg|'''Opening hours surrounding buildings''' | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''2.3 Green & Water System''' | ||
<gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | ||
Image:04_Green.jpg | Image:04_Green.jpg | ||
Line 21: | Line 30: | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
− | '''2. | + | '''2.4 Relations''' |
<gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | ||
Image:Relationship01.jpg | Image:Relationship01.jpg | ||
Line 28: | Line 37: | ||
− | '''2. | + | '''2.5 Neighbourhood Facilities System''' |
For missing facilities | For missing facilities | ||
<gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | ||
Line 35: | Line 44: | ||
=03 Conclusion= | =03 Conclusion= | ||
− | + | According the Analysis, | |
− | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow= | + | |
− | Image: | + | The city have all kinds of SYSTEMS: |
+ | |||
+ | Traffic system, Green system, Water system, Neighborhood facilities... | ||
+ | |||
+ | Only with all these specific systems working well, can the city be functioned to be persistently stable. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | But with all of the issues which we got from the interviews, | ||
+ | |||
+ | the site is basically a '''DEAD SYSTEM'''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | =04 Scenarios = | ||
+ | The scenarios are about different situations trying to bring the site back to life again. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=2> | ||
+ | Image:scenario_1.jpg|'''Current Situation''' | ||
+ | Image:scenario_2A.jpg|'''Science Centre isolated''' | ||
+ | Image:scenario_3A.jpg|'''BK-city isolated''' | ||
+ | Image:scenario_4.jpg|'''BK-city extended''' | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="float: left; width: 250px; margin-right:20px; text-align:left"> | ||
+ | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=2> | ||
+ | Image:scenario_5.jpg|'''Site extended all around''' | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-right:20px; text-align:left"> | ||
+ | '''Conclusion to the scenarios''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | When we think about the future it is clear that the Science Centre would like to change their orientation. To avoid this we should make a design which keeps them from turning, to realize this we need to make sure that the traffic is not a dangerous barrier for the Science Centre. Thus, the ‘Mijnbouwstraat’ may not get a two-way road. We need to find a solution the keep the traffic running in the site without being a barrier to the surrounding functions, while making the site OPEN again. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style="float: left; width: 1200px; text-align:justify"> | ||
− | '''<u>[[atom09: | + | '''<u>[[atom09:Archive|> Back to Atom09:Archive]]</u>''' |
Latest revision as of 13:51, 11 October 2011
Contents |
01 Interview
Reports of Interviews
02 Systems
2.1 Traffic System
Two very important one-way roads
2.2 Pedestrian System
2.3 Green & Water System
2.4 Relations
2.5 Neighbourhood Facilities System
For missing facilities
03 Conclusion
According the Analysis,
The city have all kinds of SYSTEMS:
Traffic system, Green system, Water system, Neighborhood facilities...
Only with all these specific systems working well, can the city be functioned to be persistently stable.
But with all of the issues which we got from the interviews,
the site is basically a DEAD SYSTEM.
04 Scenarios
The scenarios are about different situations trying to bring the site back to life again.
Conclusion to the scenarios
When we think about the future it is clear that the Science Centre would like to change their orientation. To avoid this we should make a design which keeps them from turning, to realize this we need to make sure that the traffic is not a dangerous barrier for the Science Centre. Thus, the ‘Mijnbouwstraat’ may not get a two-way road. We need to find a solution the keep the traffic running in the site without being a barrier to the surrounding functions, while making the site OPEN again.