atom02 talk:Home

Revision as of 06:50, 12 September 2011 (view source) Miyushi (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 13:42, 22 September 2011 (view source) Tomek (Talk | contribs)
(30 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Atom 4'''	+	<div style="float: left; width: 600px; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px;  padding-left:10px; padding-right:10px ">
		+	<b>Please see http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Talk_pages for discussion conventions</b>--[[User:ChristianFriedrich|ChristianFriedrich]] 14:10, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
		+	:If you want to respond to a comment, start your response with a colon <nowiki>(":")</nowiki> in a new line below the comment you are responding to. If you respond to a response, put two colons <nowiki>("::")</nowiki>, and so forth. After the end of your comment put <nowiki>"-- ~~~~"</nowiki> to automatically add your user name and time stamp (you can also use the "signature" button instead). -- [[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 14:15, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
		+	</div>
		+	<br style="clear: both; height: 0; line-height: 0; font-size: px; /*for IE*/"/>
−	Wei Zhu	+	__TOC__
−	Miyushi van Hijfte	+	==<b>Page structure</b>==
−	Alvin Jarving	+	1. The structure of your page is fairly clear, but, especially on the front page, try to avoid redundant information. e.g. Site plan, panoramic photos are practically copy-pasting what there is already in the brief (you can go to google map and street view from there). Most people who read the wiki know the site, focus your pages on what YOU are GOING to do with the site and WHY. --[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 14:42, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
−	'''PROJECT'''	+	2. If you reference a page, like a wiki article of Jane Jacobs, write why. We all know who she is (I hope), what is important is WHY what she wrote is relevant for you. --[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 14:42, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
		+	==<b>Content</b>==
−	http://student.hyperbody.nl/index.php/File:1.jpg	+	1. If you describe the questionnaire, You can just write one-two sentences on what is the intention behind it (and maybe a thumbnail image) and link it to a sub-page where you show more detail. Now you start with saying what the questionnaire is and only a few lines later you say what is its goal - the other way round. The same with traffic analysis. It would help to have a master point e.g. "Design input" where you first describe why and what kind of input your intervention requires, and only then, below, list questionnaires, traffic analysis and whatever else. --[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 14:42, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
−	http://student.hyperbody.nl/index.php/File:0.jpg	+
−		+
−		+
−		+
−	[[location]]	+
−		+
−	De Vries van Heystplantsoen is a small peaceful park, about 100 years old.[[image]]	+
−		+
−		+
−		+
−	Problems:	+
−		+
−	The public garden is enclosed by three busy streets. The traffic causes a lot of noise, what is maybe a bit disturbing for the peaceful experience in the public garden.[[image]]	+
−		+
−		+
−		+
−	Only a few people visited the public garden.[[interview old man]]	+
−		+
−	Maybe only if you want some time alone and consider several things in live.	+
−		+
−	People like students don’t visit it at all.[[interview student]]	+
−		+
−	The other thing is the vegetation. Especially during the summer, this place is so dense with vegetation that you don’t notice and realize that between all the busy streets there in that little piece of beautiful nature.	+
−		+
−		+
−		+
−	What kinds of people are related to ‘de Vries van Heystplantsoen’?	+
−		+
−	-students and employees especially from the faculty of architecture.	+
−		+
−	-visitors and employees of Delft Science center	+
−		+
−	-inhabitants from the new students apartments	+
−		+
−	-inhabitants of the neighborhood	+
−		+
−	-passers in cars, busses, on bikes or by foot	+
−		+
−	[[concept design]]	+

---

Latest revision as of 13:42, 22 September 2011

Contents 1 Page structure 2 Content

Page structure

1. The structure of your page is fairly clear, but, especially on the front page, try to avoid redundant information. e.g. Site plan, panoramic photos are practically copy-pasting what there is already in the brief (you can go to google map and street view from there). Most people who read the wiki know the site, focus your pages on what YOU are GOING to do with the site and WHY. --Tomek 14:42, 22 September 2011 (CEST)

2. If you reference a page, like a wiki article of Jane Jacobs, write why. We all know who she is (I hope), what is important is WHY what she wrote is relevant for you. --Tomek 14:42, 22 September 2011 (CEST)

Content

1. If you describe the questionnaire, You can just write one-two sentences on what is the intention behind it (and maybe a thumbnail image) and link it to a sub-page where you show more detail. Now you start with saying what the questionnaire is and only a few lines later you say what is its goal - the other way round. The same with traffic analysis. It would help to have a master point e.g. "Design input" where you first describe why and what kind of input your intervention requires, and only then, below, list questionnaires, traffic analysis and whatever else. --Tomek 14:42, 22 September 2011 (CEST)