atom09:Site Analysis
From student
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
the site is basically a '''DEAD SYSTEM'''. | the site is basically a '''DEAD SYSTEM'''. | ||
| − | + | ==04 Scenarios == | |
| + | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=3> | ||
| + | Image:xxxxxx.jpg | ||
| + | Image:xxxxxx.jpg | ||
| + | Image:xxxxxx.jpg | ||
| + | Image:xxxxxx.jpg | ||
| + | Image:xxxxxx.jpg | ||
| + | Image:xxxxxx.jpg | ||
| + | </gallery> | ||
<gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4> | ||
Image:07_Conclusion.jpg | Image:07_Conclusion.jpg | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 26 September 2011
Contents |
First Impression
> Slide 01 is about our first impression, at 8th September, which shows the first thoughts as a result of a brainstorm session about the site.
01 Interview
Reports of Interviews
Neighbor
Science Centre
Analysis interview Science Centre
02 Systems
2.1 Traffic System
Two very important one-way roads
Traffic Flow
Transportation
2.2 Green & Water System
2.3 Relations
2.4 Neighbourhood Facilities System
For missing facilities
03 Conclusion
According the Analysis,
The city have all kinds of SYSTEMS:
Traffic system, Green system, Water system, Neighborhood facilities...
Only with all these specific systems working well, can the city be functioned to be persistently stable.
But with all of the issues which we got from the interviews,
the site is basically a DEAD SYSTEM.
04 Scenarios
- Xxxxxx.jpg
- Xxxxxx.jpg
- Xxxxxx.jpg
- Xxxxxx.jpg
- Xxxxxx.jpg
- Xxxxxx.jpg
