atom09:Site Analysis
(→04 Scenarios) |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Image:Pedestrian_Entrances.jpg|'''Pedestrian Entrance''' | Image:Pedestrian_Entrances.jpg|'''Pedestrian Entrance''' | ||
Image:Pedestrian_Flows.jpg|'''Pedestrian Flow''' | Image:Pedestrian_Flows.jpg|'''Pedestrian Flow''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Image:Opening_hours.jpg|'''Opening hours surrounding buildings''' | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Line 59: | Line 61: | ||
The scenarios are about different situations trying to bring the site back to life again. | The scenarios are about different situations trying to bring the site back to life again. | ||
− | + | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=2> | |
− | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow= | + | |
Image:scenario_1.jpg|'''Current Situation''' | Image:scenario_1.jpg|'''Current Situation''' | ||
Image:scenario_2A.jpg|'''Science Centre isolated''' | Image:scenario_2A.jpg|'''Science Centre isolated''' | ||
Image:scenario_3A.jpg|'''BK-city isolated''' | Image:scenario_3A.jpg|'''BK-city isolated''' | ||
Image:scenario_4.jpg|'''BK-city extended''' | Image:scenario_4.jpg|'''BK-city extended''' | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="float: left; width: 250px; margin-right:20px; text-align:left"> | ||
+ | <gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=2> | ||
Image:scenario_5.jpg|'''Site extended all around''' | Image:scenario_5.jpg|'''Site extended all around''' | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
− | < | + | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | </ | + | <div style="float: left; width: 300px; margin-right:20px; text-align:left"> |
+ | '''Conclusion to the scenarios''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | When we think about the future it is clear that the Science Centre would like to change their orientation. To avoid this we should make a design which keeps them from turning, to realize this we need to make sure that the traffic is not a dangerous barrier for the Science Centre. Thus, the ‘Mijnbouwstraat’ may not get a two-way road. We need to find a solution the keep the traffic running in the site without being a barrier to the surrounding functions, while making the site OPEN again. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style="float: left; width: 1200px; text-align:justify"> | ||
'''<u>[[atom09:Archive|> Back to Atom09:Archive]]</u>''' | '''<u>[[atom09:Archive|> Back to Atom09:Archive]]</u>''' |
Latest revision as of 13:51, 11 October 2011
Contents |
01 Interview
Reports of Interviews
02 Systems
2.1 Traffic System
Two very important one-way roads
2.2 Pedestrian System
2.3 Green & Water System
2.4 Relations
2.5 Neighbourhood Facilities System
For missing facilities
03 Conclusion
According the Analysis,
The city have all kinds of SYSTEMS:
Traffic system, Green system, Water system, Neighborhood facilities...
Only with all these specific systems working well, can the city be functioned to be persistently stable.
But with all of the issues which we got from the interviews,
the site is basically a DEAD SYSTEM.
04 Scenarios
The scenarios are about different situations trying to bring the site back to life again.
Conclusion to the scenarios
When we think about the future it is clear that the Science Centre would like to change their orientation. To avoid this we should make a design which keeps them from turning, to realize this we need to make sure that the traffic is not a dangerous barrier for the Science Centre. Thus, the ‘Mijnbouwstraat’ may not get a two-way road. We need to find a solution the keep the traffic running in the site without being a barrier to the surrounding functions, while making the site OPEN again.