atom10:Process
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Future scenario== | ==Future scenario== | ||
| − | <gallery widths=" | + | <gallery widths="100" heights="150" perrow="6" > |
| − | File: | + | File:An1.jpg|'''Cross-programming''' |
| − | File: | + | File:An2.jpg|'''Trans-programming''' |
| − | File: | + | File:An3.jpg|'''Dis-programming''' |
| + | File:An4.jpg|'''Cross-programming''' | ||
| + | File:An5.jpg|'''Trans-programming''' | ||
| + | File:An6.jpg|'''Dis-programming''' | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 09:41, 10 October 2011
Contents |
Future scenario
Cross-programming
Trans-programming
Dis-programming
Cross-programming
Trans-programming
Dis-programming
It seems logical to consider the future requirements of the site as part of the existing context. With the global population set to exceed 7 billion this year, there will be increasing pressure on the current housing stock. Regulations stipulate that a strategy must be created to adapt the urban infrastructure as a pre-requisite for future housing development. In this way, the intervention can precipitate the future scenario by beginning to implement the sites requirements in a local and on the larger scale. It seems that the implementation of infrastructure and housing have been discussed, but so far there has been little thought into how and what auxiliary and interstitial activities should be provided. Our intervention can begin to provide these activities and form a framework which develops in conjunction with new infrastructure developments.
Process
Method
Cross-programming - Gives an old building/space a new function or programme not intended for it.
Trans-programming - Places two programmes that are not normally associated with each other together.
Dis-programming - Positioning two functions together so that one can potentially undo/induce the other.
