atom11 talk:Home
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==<b>Page structure</b>== | ==<b>Page structure</b>== | ||
| − | 1. | + | 1. Very clear structure. I think it works well if you make a page out of a word in the description (e.g. intimacy, survey) that gives the reader more information on the details of it. --[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST) |
==<b>Content</b>== | ==<b>Content</b>== | ||
| − | 1. | + | 1. I would encourage you to think beyond the stereotype of the "park". What's more, I would encourage you to think of the site as simply a unique place, you can propose any kind of development in there that you think is needed in delft, the place can facilitate, generate, encourage any kind of activity of any kind of users. Don't let its "parkness" limit you. On the other hand investigating down to the most specific details what qualities of the park are valuable for people can give you a lot of design hints. --[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST) |
Revision as of 14:22, 22 September 2011
Please see http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Talk_pages for discussion conventions--ChristianFriedrich 14:10, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
- If you want to respond to a comment, start your response with a colon (":") in a new line below the comment you are responding to. If you respond to a response, put two colons ("::"), and so forth. After the end of your comment put "-- ~~~~" to automatically add your user name and time stamp (you can also use the "signature" button instead). -- Tomek 14:15, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
Contents |
Page structure
1. Very clear structure. I think it works well if you make a page out of a word in the description (e.g. intimacy, survey) that gives the reader more information on the details of it. --Tomek 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
Content
1. I would encourage you to think beyond the stereotype of the "park". What's more, I would encourage you to think of the site as simply a unique place, you can propose any kind of development in there that you think is needed in delft, the place can facilitate, generate, encourage any kind of activity of any kind of users. Don't let its "parkness" limit you. On the other hand investigating down to the most specific details what qualities of the park are valuable for people can give you a lot of design hints. --Tomek 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
