atom11 talk:Home
(→Content) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
1. I would encourage you to think beyond the stereotype of the "park". What's more, I would encourage you to think of the site as simply a unique place, you can propose any kind of development in there that you think is needed in delft, the place can facilitate, generate, encourage any kind of activity of any kind of users. Don't let its "parkness" limit you. On the other hand investigating down to the most specific details what qualities of the park are valuable for people can give you a lot of design hints. --[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST) | 1. I would encourage you to think beyond the stereotype of the "park". What's more, I would encourage you to think of the site as simply a unique place, you can propose any kind of development in there that you think is needed in delft, the place can facilitate, generate, encourage any kind of activity of any kind of users. Don't let its "parkness" limit you. On the other hand investigating down to the most specific details what qualities of the park are valuable for people can give you a lot of design hints. --[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. The idea of "control" (of the flow of people in your case), I find a bit fishy. Makes me think of a theme park attraction with a queue of people lining up to enter, walk through and leave, and a fat guy eating potato chips behind a security camera observing them. Or a big borther scenario. Instead, how about thinking beyond the park, what makes people come there, is it really in everyone's best interest to keep a steady number of people in the park? Or is it maybe that you would like to eliminate mutual disturbance, not the number of people per se.... keep asking yourselves questions, don't fall into easy assumptions--[[User:Tomek|Tomek]] 16:27, 22 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:27, 22 September 2011
Please see http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Talk_pages for discussion conventions--ChristianFriedrich 14:10, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
- If you want to respond to a comment, start your response with a colon (":") in a new line below the comment you are responding to. If you respond to a response, put two colons ("::"), and so forth. After the end of your comment put "-- ~~~~" to automatically add your user name and time stamp (you can also use the "signature" button instead). -- Tomek 14:15, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
Contents |
Page structure
1. Very clear structure. I think it works well if you make a page out of a word in the description (e.g. intimacy, survey) that gives the reader more information on the details of it. --Tomek 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
Content
1. I would encourage you to think beyond the stereotype of the "park". What's more, I would encourage you to think of the site as simply a unique place, you can propose any kind of development in there that you think is needed in delft, the place can facilitate, generate, encourage any kind of activity of any kind of users. Don't let its "parkness" limit you. On the other hand investigating down to the most specific details what qualities of the park are valuable for people can give you a lot of design hints. --Tomek 16:22, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
2. The idea of "control" (of the flow of people in your case), I find a bit fishy. Makes me think of a theme park attraction with a queue of people lining up to enter, walk through and leave, and a fat guy eating potato chips behind a security camera observing them. Or a big borther scenario. Instead, how about thinking beyond the park, what makes people come there, is it really in everyone's best interest to keep a steady number of people in the park? Or is it maybe that you would like to eliminate mutual disturbance, not the number of people per se.... keep asking yourselves questions, don't fall into easy assumptions--Tomek 16:27, 22 September 2011 (CEST)
