project G:Different systems
(→Actuators and threads) |
(→Gearing in between) |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
'''Advantages''' | '''Advantages''' | ||
| − | - | + | - Only 2 engines per box. |
| − | - | + | - Less weight due to less engines. |
- Individual controlable | - Individual controlable | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
'''Disadvantages''' | '''Disadvantages''' | ||
| − | - | + | - Connection is vulnerable. |
| − | - | + | - By failing element no more possibillity to move box |
| − | - | + | - Less load bearing |
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
. | . | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
='''Clicking mechanism'''= | ='''Clicking mechanism'''= | ||
Revision as of 10:22, 17 November 2011
Actuators and threads
For this principle we use normal actuators. To give some indication a actuator with 1200n will:
- Have a size around 40mm*750mm
- Cost around 100 euro
- selflocking 800n
Advantages
- Small engines needed
- Simple principle
- Stabil/solid connections
- Big differences between neigboring elements possible
Disadvantages
- 4 Engines per box needed.
- Weight system
- Lot of chance of failure due to the number of engines.
.
Gearing in between
Advantages
- Only 2 engines per box.
- Less weight due to less engines.
- Individual controlable
- Big differences between neigboring pistons possible
Disadvantages
- Connection is vulnerable.
- By failing element no more possibillity to move box
- Less load bearing
.
Clicking mechanism
Advantages
- Highly pixelated which gives a freedom
- One actuator per piston
- Individual controlable
- Big differences between neigboring pistons possible
Disadvantages
- Supported by a framework, this connection can't be lost.
- Always vissible / present.
- Fixed movement possibillity's, in relation to the frame
.
