project G:Different systems
(→Gearing in between) |
(→Clicking mechanism) |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
'''Advantages''' | '''Advantages''' | ||
− | - | + | - Big actuators stay on the ground. |
− | - | + | - Lightweight boxes |
− | - | + | - Lot of space inside the box |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Line 110: | Line 108: | ||
'''Disadvantages''' | '''Disadvantages''' | ||
− | - | + | - 16 actuators per box needed. |
− | - | + | - Vulnerable connections. |
− | - | + | - needs to 'reset' for change in lay out. |
Revision as of 10:25, 17 November 2011
Actuators and threads
For this principle we use normal actuators. To give some indication a actuator with 1200n will:
- Have a size around 40mm*750mm
- Cost around 100 euro
- selflocking 800n
Advantages
- Small engines needed
- Simple principle
- Stabil/solid connections
- Big differences between neigboring elements possible
Disadvantages
- 4 Engines per box needed.
- Weight system
- Lot of chance of failure due to the number of engines.
.
Gearing in between
Advantages
- Only 2 engines per box.
- Less weight due to less engines.
- Individual controlable
- Big differences between neigboring pistons possible
Disadvantages
- Connection is vulnerable.
- By failing element no more possibillity to move box
- Less load bearing
.
Clicking mechanism
Advantages
- Big actuators stay on the ground.
- Lightweight boxes
- Lot of space inside the box
Disadvantages
- 16 actuators per box needed.
- Vulnerable connections.
- needs to 'reset' for change in lay out.
.