project K:Home
(→Initimacy (through 3 different scales)) |
(→Intimacy V Disruption: constructing fire) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="float:right; width: 600px;">[[File:Fire.jpg|400px]]</div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="float:left; width: 400px;"> | ||
We propose to concurrently explore the idea of intimacy and disruption through the introduction of fire to the site. This intervention will study what effect the introduction of an atypical activity has on users and local inhabitants and how and why fire creates an intimate space. | We propose to concurrently explore the idea of intimacy and disruption through the introduction of fire to the site. This intervention will study what effect the introduction of an atypical activity has on users and local inhabitants and how and why fire creates an intimate space. | ||
| + | |||
Fire is a medium which can connect intimacy and disruption depending on its scale and intensity. On the scale of the camp fire it can evoke a primeval sense of protection, by emitting heat and in darkness it defines a visible perimeter, a space of intimacy. However out of control and on the scale of a forest fire or building it can be dangerous and disruptive. For our intervention/experiment, the forest fire is a good example. Whilst being ultimately disruptive and destructive, some ecosystems have evolved with fire as a natural and necessary contributor to habitat vitality and renewal. | Fire is a medium which can connect intimacy and disruption depending on its scale and intensity. On the scale of the camp fire it can evoke a primeval sense of protection, by emitting heat and in darkness it defines a visible perimeter, a space of intimacy. However out of control and on the scale of a forest fire or building it can be dangerous and disruptive. For our intervention/experiment, the forest fire is a good example. Whilst being ultimately disruptive and destructive, some ecosystems have evolved with fire as a natural and necessary contributor to habitat vitality and renewal. | ||
| − | + | </div> | |
| + | |||
| + | <div style="float:left; width: 1000px;"> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Each scale can be either intimate or disruptive, and | + | We will design and construct and examine various fires based on different scales and typologies - Candle/Small Flame, Hearth/Fireplace and Bonfire/Forest Fire. Each scale can be either intimate or disruptive, and the project should define specific instances in which each condition is manifested at each scale. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 16:45, 11 October 2011
Intimacy V Disruption: constructing fire
We propose to concurrently explore the idea of intimacy and disruption through the introduction of fire to the site. This intervention will study what effect the introduction of an atypical activity has on users and local inhabitants and how and why fire creates an intimate space.
Fire is a medium which can connect intimacy and disruption depending on its scale and intensity. On the scale of the camp fire it can evoke a primeval sense of protection, by emitting heat and in darkness it defines a visible perimeter, a space of intimacy. However out of control and on the scale of a forest fire or building it can be dangerous and disruptive. For our intervention/experiment, the forest fire is a good example. Whilst being ultimately disruptive and destructive, some ecosystems have evolved with fire as a natural and necessary contributor to habitat vitality and renewal.
We will design and construct and examine various fires based on different scales and typologies - Candle/Small Flame, Hearth/Fireplace and Bonfire/Forest Fire. Each scale can be either intimate or disruptive, and the project should define specific instances in which each condition is manifested at each scale.
