atom10:CONCEPT-CHALLENGE
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=='''Analysis'''== | =='''Analysis'''== | ||
| − | [[File:Process.jpg|thumb| | + | [[File:Process.jpg|thumb|none|600px|caption ]] |
| − | [[File:3analysis.jpg|thumb| | + | [[File:3analysis.jpg|thumb|none|600px|caption]] |
| − | [[File:DIAGRAMS.jpg|thumb| | + | [[File:DIAGRAMS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|caption]] |
| − | [[File:4reflections.jpg|thumb| | + | [[File:4reflections.jpg|thumb|none|600px|caption]] |
| − | [[File:5method.jpg|thumb| | + | [[File:5method.jpg|thumb|none|600px|caption]] |
“Architecture is a combination of Space, Events and Movement without any hierarchy” | “Architecture is a combination of Space, Events and Movement without any hierarchy” | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
At the same time we want to develop a matrix or diagram representing the different possible uses of space. | At the same time we want to develop a matrix or diagram representing the different possible uses of space. | ||
| − | [[Image:Matrix.jpg|thumb| | + | [[Image:Matrix.jpg|thumb|none|600px|caption ]] |
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | =='''Work in progress'''== | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Matrix of imaginery uses''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | #Oral history museum | ||
| + | #Bar/Nightclub | ||
| + | #Botanical garden | ||
| + | #DMT vending machines* | ||
| + | #Bicycle lock/shelter | ||
| + | #Playground | ||
| + | #Library | ||
| + | #Sushi restaurant | ||
| + | #Gym | ||
| + | #24 hour shop | ||
| + | #Japanese tea house | ||
| + | #Petrol station | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Client''': people moving through the space | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Challenge''': disrupting the monoculture of the institutions | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Intervention''': auxiliary uses which break the rhythm of movement and the contours of the institutions | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | three methods define the intervention: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The intervention will be responsive to the different proposed uses. Optimisation will occur between conflicting uses, existing movement and rhythm and the density constraints of the site. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *'''Site analysis''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mapping density of elements in the park. By mapping density we can create a gradient of possibilities. The density will indicate what is accessible and will fluctuate according to the season. This denisty will map the site plan and indicate where the intervention can form. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Bitmap.jpg|thumb|none|300px|caption]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Bit2.jpg|thumb|none|300px|caption]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Layers.jpg|thumb|none|300px|caption]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *'''Rhythm analysis''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The surrounding institutions control the rhythm of movement and activity surrounding and extending beyond the site. We need to map and represent the contours of the flow of people around the site. This analysis will help us to define where the intervention can engage with users. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *'''Imagined use analysis''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Imagining activities and their requirements to create a matrix of characteristics which can be compared and contrasted. Allowing us to analyse how different uses can interact and inform other uses and forms. What is the reaction of uses? How do they disrupt the existing flows and rhythms? | ||
[[Atom10:Home| Back to Home]] | [[Atom10:Home| Back to Home]] | ||
Revision as of 09:45, 25 September 2011
Analysis
“Architecture is a combination of Space, Events and Movement without any hierarchy” (Bernard Tschumi)
_The concepts of cross/trans/dis-programming will allow for a flow of dialogue by emphasizing transformation, adaptation and movement in design. _Trans-programming can produce a path for urban interchange. The unexpected interaction resulting from this is the challenge. _Dialogue between form and function results in spaces of urban interchange. In this way the flow of dialogue is not only increased between the different users of the space/building, but also between the users and the space/building/urban sourranding.
Now we want to create a description of our purposed/imaginery activities, exploring how they would use the site and what sort of structure they requires. At the same time we want to develop a matrix or diagram representing the different possible uses of space.
Work in progress
Matrix of imaginery uses
- Oral history museum
- Bar/Nightclub
- Botanical garden
- DMT vending machines*
- Bicycle lock/shelter
- Playground
- Library
- Sushi restaurant
- Gym
- 24 hour shop
- Japanese tea house
- Petrol station
Client: people moving through the space
Challenge: disrupting the monoculture of the institutions
Intervention: auxiliary uses which break the rhythm of movement and the contours of the institutions
three methods define the intervention:
The intervention will be responsive to the different proposed uses. Optimisation will occur between conflicting uses, existing movement and rhythm and the density constraints of the site.
- Site analysis
Mapping density of elements in the park. By mapping density we can create a gradient of possibilities. The density will indicate what is accessible and will fluctuate according to the season. This denisty will map the site plan and indicate where the intervention can form.
- Rhythm analysis
The surrounding institutions control the rhythm of movement and activity surrounding and extending beyond the site. We need to map and represent the contours of the flow of people around the site. This analysis will help us to define where the intervention can engage with users.
- Imagined use analysis
Imagining activities and their requirements to create a matrix of characteristics which can be compared and contrasted. Allowing us to analyse how different uses can interact and inform other uses and forms. What is the reaction of uses? How do they disrupt the existing flows and rhythms?
