Revision as of 09:01, 17 October 2011 (view source) Esther (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:10, 17 October 2011 (view source) Esther (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	A. The site is part of a bigger system.		A. The site is part of a bigger system.
		+
		+	B. The site has two big barriers which form the boundaries.
		+	C. The site is not useful for its surrounding.
		+	Conclusion C is also a result of the boundaries mentioned in conclusion B.
−	B. The site is not useful for its surrounding.
−
−
−	C. The site has two big barriers which form the boundaries.

---

Revision as of 11:10, 17 October 2011

We made different analysis, through this research we found out that there were several disadvantages at the site.

A. The site is part of a bigger system.

B. The site has two big barriers which form the boundaries. C. The site is not useful for its surrounding. Conclusion C is also a result of the boundaries mentioned in conclusion B.

This leaded to the final conclusion;

D. The site is a DEAD SYSTEM.

References

Online Sources;

- Wikipedia Systems

PDF Files;

- Architecture, interaction, systems

- Architectural relevance of gordon pask

- An Outline of General System Theory (1950)

- The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology

- Architectural relevance of cybernetics