atom09:Research
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="float: left; width: 330px; margin-right:20px; text-align:left"> | <div style="float: left; width: 330px; margin-right:20px; text-align:left"> | ||
| − | |||
This leaded to the final conclusion; | This leaded to the final conclusion; | ||
| − | |||
D. The site is a DEAD SYSTEM. | D. The site is a DEAD SYSTEM. | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 17 October 2011
Here you can find the conclusions of the different analysis we made. Through this research we found out that there were several disadvantages at the site which we need to change.
For more information look at > Analysis.
The analysis showed us that,
A. The site is part of a bigger system.
We found several negative points which keeps people from getting into the site.
B. The site has two big barriers which form the boundaries.
C. The site is not useful for its surrounding.
Conclusion C is also a result of the boundaries mentioned in conclusion B.
This leaded to the final conclusion;
D. The site is a DEAD SYSTEM.
References
Online Sources;
PDF Files;
- Architecture, interaction, systems
- Architectural relevance of gordon pask
- An Outline of General System Theory (1950)
- The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology
- Architectural relevance of cybernetics