atom11:21.09.11

From student
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Intervention Proposal)
(Intervention Proposal)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
===Intervention Proposal===
 
===Intervention Proposal===
  
The challenge is not to simply accommodate more people, the challenge becomes how to monitor, and respond to, the amount of users entering the park.  To do this, we propose the further isolation of the site through eliminating all but one or two strategic "entrance points." These entrance points will record '''traffic patterns''' both in and out of the park and will serve as both a '''beacon''' and a '''funnel''' for the site, both advertising its location while simultaneously responding to the amount of people who may enter.  The entrance points will constrict or expand based on how many people are using the site.  This function alone will attract attention to the site.  
+
The challenge is not to simply accommodate more people, the challenge becomes how to monitor, and respond to, the presence of users entering the site (since the site is often empty).  To do this, we propose the further isolation of the site through eliminating all but one or two strategic "entrance points." These entrance points will record '''traffic patterns''' both in and out of the park and will serve as both a '''beacon''' and a '''funnel''' for the site, both advertising its location while simultaneously responding to the presence of users.  The entrance points communicate with a noise barrier that will only operate when the site is occupied and cars are passing by.  
In eliminating  entrances, we will have an opportunity to introduce certain fast-growing trees and plants that will, in effect, create a "jungle-like" atmosphere inside the site (during summer months), and also help to address noise issues.  At this moment we also must develop a '''relationship''' with a landscape architect to guide our exploration into the horticultural side of our proposal.
+
In rethinking the entry conditions, we will have an opportunity to integrate the noise barrier with the new entrances.
  
 
<gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4>
 
<gallery widths=200px heights=200px perrow=4>

Revision as of 15:40, 26 September 2011

Intervention Proposal

The challenge is not to simply accommodate more people, the challenge becomes how to monitor, and respond to, the presence of users entering the site (since the site is often empty). To do this, we propose the further isolation of the site through eliminating all but one or two strategic "entrance points." These entrance points will record traffic patterns both in and out of the park and will serve as both a beacon and a funnel for the site, both advertising its location while simultaneously responding to the presence of users. The entrance points communicate with a noise barrier that will only operate when the site is occupied and cars are passing by. In rethinking the entry conditions, we will have an opportunity to integrate the noise barrier with the new entrances.


Go Back to Main Page

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Projects
Atoms
Toolbox