atom11:Healy
From student
(Difference between revisions)
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Abstraction or not, the research methodology we have employed has resulted in a database of information from which we can draw certain concrete conclusions about how humans experience their environment. The question of an “extra architectural concept” will be an integral part of how we proceed in Phase II. | Abstraction or not, the research methodology we have employed has resulted in a database of information from which we can draw certain concrete conclusions about how humans experience their environment. The question of an “extra architectural concept” will be an integral part of how we proceed in Phase II. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
[[File:Water to water.JPG|250px]] | [[File:Water to water.JPG|250px]] | ||
Line 18: | Line 12: | ||
[[File:Conversation chair.JPG|250px|]] | [[File:Conversation chair.JPG|250px|]] | ||
Conversation chair | Conversation chair | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Atom11:Healy No Wordcount|'''More from Professor Healy''']] | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Atom11:connections|'''Go Back''']] |
Revision as of 15:43, 12 October 2011
Patrick Healy
Senior Lecturer, Delft School of Design
Professor Healy will be unable to attend our critique due to an impending deadline
According to Mr. Healy, cataloguing the affordances of the environment is an act of abstraction. The power of the work of Peter Zumthor, Steven Holl or Daniel Libeskind lies in their ability to create an extra architectural concept, an idea that organizes and validates the following design decisions.
Abstraction or not, the research methodology we have employed has resulted in a database of information from which we can draw certain concrete conclusions about how humans experience their environment. The question of an “extra architectural concept” will be an integral part of how we proceed in Phase II.