atom06:Analysis
From student
(Difference between revisions)
(→Subjective analyses) |
|||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
<div style="float:left; border:none; width:240px; margin-right: 10px; overflow:hidden; " > | <div style="float:left; border:none; width:240px; margin-right: 10px; overflow:hidden; " > | ||
| − | [[File:Flows typology merge copia.jpg | frameless | | + | [[File:Flows typology merge copia.jpg | frameless | 270px | link=atom06:Subjective analysis]] |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="float:left; border:none; width:240px; margin-right: 10px; overflow:hidden; " > | <div style="float:left; border:none; width:240px; margin-right: 10px; overflow:hidden; " > | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="float:left; border:none; width:250px; margin-right: 10px; " > | <div style="float:left; border:none; width:250px; margin-right: 10px; " > | ||
| − | + | The park paths' layout is protected. Keeping the layout but extending the greenery and pedestrian area, serves best the needs for connecting the site to immediate surroundings. | |
| − | + | Open water needs to be added for reasons of water security (flooding) and ecology (bats, wasteland ecologies). Water is also a natural entry barrier. | |
| − | the faculty of architecture | + | |
| + | Re-routing the highly trafficked roads removes the site from isolation and returns the park to work as a connecting entity between the Science Center and the faculty of architecture. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 76: | Line 77: | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
| − | + | Park is not used or known. Extending the hidden park to a city park serves the needs of residents and TU campus visitors. | |
| − | + | A large campus park will work towards creating an image of TU Delft as a significant world class university and work as a gateway for visitors and as a place to relax for personnel and students alike. | |
| − | </div> | + | </div> |
See more on [[atom06:Subjective analysis| Subjective analyses]] | See more on [[atom06:Subjective analysis| Subjective analyses]] | ||
| Line 91: | Line 92: | ||
<div style="float:left; border:none; margin-right: 10px; " > | <div style="float:left; border:none; margin-right: 10px; " > | ||
| + | |||
=[[atom06:Interviews| '''Interviews''']]= | =[[atom06:Interviews| '''Interviews''']]= | ||
Revision as of 15:31, 17 October 2011
Contents |
Interviews
Students
& Teachers
.
Students live in the area and spend a lot of time next to or around the site during the week.
- nobody uses the space
- would be a good place to meet, different from the (boring) standard of the TU everywhere else
- has a lot of potential
Resident-
Harry Koerts
.
- there is no connection between the residents and the TU
- the park is a green enclave in the city, but nobody uses it as it's hidden between busy roads
- in the evenings the park is unsafe
- (future) student residents will probably see the park as their back yard
Deflt City, Environmental office - Diny Tubbing
Diny Tubbing is the writer of the report Ecologieplan Delft 2004 - 2015, department of greenery of the city Delft
- Changing the roads
- Extending the water structure
- Park historical value & maintanance
Gardener at the botanical gardens - Karel Oberman
- in the beginning there were plans to extend to the Vries van Heystplantsoen, but the city didn't want to cooperate
- there even is a road going to the park, but now it just has a closed gate
- the gardens host musical events and facilitate workshops
- they sow into the community in that they also employ the handicapped
Director of the Science Center - Michael van der Meer
- the busy Mijnbouwstraat is a real hindrance to the public
- they feel separated from the TU because of the busy roads and the not-used park, they want to become ONE whole
- there is no parking, so people have to park behind the faculty of Architecture
- they want to expand
Conclusions
- It can be seen that there is a desire that these two systems get more integrated and start to actively communicate and interact to create a better whole
- The interviews back up the initial striving for a city park from several sides.
Network analyses
After the objective analyses and the subjective analyses, the goal is to gather information with the theoretical model (the actor-network-theory) in mind.
The result of these analyses are an understanding of how the current networks are related and function.
From these findings the concept of connections and redistribution of the networks has been set
The models of activities per usergroup are set up and show that there are matching activities per usergroup for the possibility for a better interaction on our location.
Conclusions
- Show that the two systems do not cooperate or interact on a physical level very well, while on a virtual level there are some connections.
- The mapping of activities show that there are several matches to increase interaction between various user groups
