project B:Design Plan
(→Design) |
(→Design) |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
The design is capable of being moved and changed into different configurations according to the use of the space on the particular time. | The design is capable of being moved and changed into different configurations according to the use of the space on the particular time. | ||
| − | + | ...information on movability of legs and why this is important in this design considering the protoDECK | |
| − | + | ...show map already made about the general protoSPACE zones (think, present, communicate, collaborate, produce ...) | |
| + | ...explain why we used especially this part of the protoDECK: curved to both sides, connection to protoSPACE if it is built up in design location (etc) | ||
[[File:ProtoTribuneoption0.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Default: used as tribune towards screens, storage and workspaces in the back and computer controls on the beginning and end to adjust settings of protoSPACE and work with the protoTAG system]] | [[File:ProtoTribuneoption0.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Default: used as tribune towards screens, storage and workspaces in the back and computer controls on the beginning and end to adjust settings of protoSPACE and work with the protoTAG system]] | ||
| − | [[File:ProtoTribuneoption1.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Option 1: Parts can be taken ]] | + | [[File:ProtoTribuneoption1.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Option 1: Parts can be taken out of the construction without affecting its structural integrity]] |
| − | [[File:ProtoTribuneOption2.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Option 2]] | + | [[File:ProtoTribuneOption2.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Option 2: by creating a ]] |
[[File:ProtoTribuneoption3.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Option 3]] | [[File:ProtoTribuneoption3.jpg|500px|thumb|left|Option 3]] | ||
| Line 74: | Line 75: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Revision as of 08:52, 1 December 2011
Team
And us:
Please use our feedback form and help us improve.
Public progress document
Follow us on Twitter: @HyberPublicNL
Our website (under construction) : www.HyperPublic.nl
HyperPublic : Theory: Home / Project B: Home
Research conclusions
Last weeks we have done a more thoroughly research about our topic. We interviewed multiple professors about their ideas on our topic of research. Also we got more information from the atoms through a discussion and a workshop. The results of these interviews and workshops, together with the old interviews are listed here
Some conclusions can be drawn from this research, which we need to take into account in order to make a proper design:
- We should find a common topic where the atoms relate to, use this as the topic for our design. Find related tools within this design.
- The tools we use in the design should be recognizable and easy to use by any user, no extra effort should have to be put into using the tool by the user, otherwise it will simple not be used.
- Use existing, standardized, software to build up your design. These are proven concepts and users can already identify with them. By merging multiple systems we can do something new.
- In order to make collaboration work, there needs to be a physical element in the design, something multiple users can relate to and interact with.
- We have to create content ourselves, translate the needs of the user (atoms) to a certain tool. We should find the tools ourselves and master them in order to make a proper translation for the atoms. We should be an added value for the users.
Design
The design is capable of being moved and changed into different configurations according to the use of the space on the particular time.
...information on movability of legs and why this is important in this design considering the protoDECK ...show map already made about the general protoSPACE zones (think, present, communicate, collaborate, produce ...) ...explain why we used especially this part of the protoDECK: curved to both sides, connection to protoSPACE if it is built up in design location (etc)
HyperPublic : Project B: Home
